What?

Jan. 7th, 2012 01:19 pm
unwritten_icons: (Default)
[personal profile] unwritten_icons
How is "IchiRuki is necrophilia!" a valid argument? In fact, how is it an argument at all?

Do the people who say this even know what necrophilia IS? Clearly not. Necrophilia is sexual attraction toward corpses. As in, dead bodies. As in, Rukia is not a dead body, she is a SPIRIT.

Ichigo is a spirit when not in his living body. Rukia can use a gigai while he's in his living body.

I mean hell, there are plenty of arguments against IchiRuki, so why do people use this dumbass one so much? Really? Really?

Date: 2012-01-07 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laerkstrein.livejournal.com
People say the same shit about things like Toshiro/Karin, which isn't sexual at all due to their age. Spirit doesn't necessarily mean death. I mean, come on. This is ridiculous! Besides, they haven't even had that kind of contact in the canon universe! And I don't see people flipping out over things like IchiHime, because "Ichigo's technicaly a spirit, OMFG!!!"

Pointless arguement, really.

While on the subject, I've also seen this sort of thing about Corpse Bride. My dad even thought that the film was abouta necrophilliac. WTFH?! Last I checked, your definition was correct: Necrophillia is a "sexual attraction to a corpse." And, if I remember correctly, which I know I do, Victor VanDort isn't in love with the Corpse Bride; she's in love with him.

People need to wake the fuck up. Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if there were mangas out there about such things, look at Black Butler's Undertaker for crying out loud, but it's certainly not in Bleach or anything I know I watch. Really, people? Really?

Profile

unwritten_icons: (Default)
unwritten_icons

November 2012

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 05:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios